How we prove it
01
A named section of the Internal Revenue Code that actually authorizes the result. If nobody can point to the statute, there is no strategy.
02
How the statute is applied. A regulation that shuts the door is the end of the conversation, not a footnote.
03
Revenue rulings, revenue procedures, notices. Useful. Not a substitute for the statute.
04
Tax Court, Courts of Appeals, Supreme Court — on facts like these. A case on different facts is not proof.
05
A promoter deck, a podcast, an IRS publication, a blog, or “everyone does this.” Publications are guidance. They are not substantial authority.
Doctrine
The claimed result is in the statute, on these facts — not a cousin of the statute.
The transaction changes economic position in a meaningful way apart from federal income tax, and the taxpayer has a substantial non-tax purpose.
A real non-tax reason a reasonable person would do this even if the tax disappeared.
What actually happened matches the labels on the paper. Circular cash and same-day round trips fail here.
The IRS may collapse steps done in substance as one deal. If the tax result depends on ignoring that, it does not hold.
Income is taxed to the person who earned it. Moving a check to a child, a trust, or an entity you still control is not proof.
Listed transactions, transactions of interest, and §6662A bases. A promoter who says “do not file Form 8886” is the answer: decline.
This practice signs a return only with substantial authority, or reasonable basis plus disclosure. A hope is not a position.
The gate
This is a screen, not a ruling. A hold here still requires the proof pack and a written fee. Open the client portal to save a full workpaper.
Proof pack
This page is general information, not tax advice for your facts. No engagement exists until the fee is in writing. Robert Wood, EA · Williamston office.